Sage Intacct Pricing for Multi-Entity & Holding Companies (2026)

Sage Intacct pricing is not a flat subscription.

For multi-entity organizations, cost is driven by structure — not just user count.

If you operate multiple legal entities under a parent–subsidiary or holding-company model, pricing reflects:

  • Number of entities
  • Consolidation complexity
  • Intercompany automation requirements
  • Reporting modules
  • User roles and permissions
  • Implementation scope

This guide explains what multi-entity businesses actually pay, what drives cost, and when Sage Intacct is financially justified.

The Real Pricing Range for Multi-Entity Organizations

For organizations operating 3–20 legal entities, total annual cost typically falls between:

$15,000 and $45,000 per year

Highly customized environments can exceed this range.

This includes:

  • Base platform subscription
  • Multi-entity configuration
  • Consolidation modules
  • Core financial modules
  • User licenses

Implementation fees are separate.

What Drives Sage Intacct Pricing in Multi-Entity Environments

1. Entity Count

Each legal entity adds:

  • Reporting layers
  • Consolidation requirements
  • Intercompany relationships
  • Permission controls

Entity count is one of the largest cost multipliers.

A 3-entity structure is materially different from a 12-entity structure.

2. Consolidation Complexity

Consolidation under IFRS 10 or ASC 810 requires:

  • Ownership-aware reporting
  • Elimination rules
  • FX handling for multi-currency groups
  • Minority interest treatment

If complexity is limited to financial consolidation, Intacct handles this efficiently.

If structural ownership modeling becomes highly layered, evaluation of NetSuite may become appropriate.

3. Intercompany Automation Requirements

Groups with:

  • High intercompany transaction volume
  • Recurring management fees
  • Shared service allocations
  • Internal lending

Require automation to reduce reconciliation effort.

The more intercompany activity, the more configuration is required.

4. User Count & Role Segmentation

Pricing varies depending on:

  • Finance-only users
  • Departmental users
  • Approval workflow users
  • Reporting-only users

Multi-entity environments often require tiered access structures.

5. Implementation Scope

Implementation for multi-entity organizations typically ranges:

2–4 months

Cost varies depending on:

  • Data migration complexity
  • Chart of accounts redesign
  • Intercompany setup
  • Reporting configuration

Implementation frequently ranges between:

$10,000–$50,000 one-time

Complex groups may exceed this.

What Sage Intacct Does NOT Charge For

Unlike some ERP systems, Sage Intacct does not require full operational ERP modules unless needed.

This keeps cost controlled when:

  • Complexity is primarily financial
  • Inventory or manufacturing modules are unnecessary
  • Operational sprawl is limited

For finance-first holding companies, this often keeps total cost below NetSuite.

Is Sage Intacct Worth the Cost?

The better question is:

What is the cost of staying on structurally misaligned software?

For multi-entity businesses operating 5+ subsidiaries, spreadsheet consolidation often leads to:

  • 20–40% longer close cycles
  • Recurring reconciliation effort
  • Higher audit adjustments
  • Key-person dependency

When finance teams are spending days reconciling eliminations manually, the subscription difference becomes secondary.

Automation often offsets cost through:

  • Labor savings
  • Reduced audit remediation
  • Improved reporting confidence

When Sage Intacct Is the Right Financial Decision

Sage Intacct is typically justified when:

  • You operate 3–20 entities
  • Consolidated reporting is required monthly
  • Intercompany activity is recurring
  • Close time exceeds 8–10 days due to reconciliation
  • Complexity is financial, not operational

If entity count is high and acquisitions are active, evaluating NetSuite may be appropriate.

See the full comparison in NetSuite vs Sage Intacct.

When Sage Intacct May Not Be Enough

Intacct may not be the best long-term fit if:

  • Entity count exceeds 20 and growing rapidly
  • Ownership structures are deeply layered
  • International operational modules are required
  • Full ERP integration is necessary

In these cases, NetSuite often becomes the more durable choice.

Hidden Cost Considerations

When evaluating pricing, consider:

  • Reimplementation risk if the system is outgrown
  • Integration cost with external tools
  • Ongoing administrative overhead
  • Finance team efficiency impact

Choosing a lower subscription cost today but migrating again in 3 years is rarely cheaper.

Final Pricing Perspective

Sage Intacct is rarely the cheapest accounting platform.

It is often the most cost-efficient multi-entity platform for finance-driven holding companies.

Subscription cost matters.

Structural alignment matters more.

What to Do Next

If you are evaluating Sage Intacct:

  1. Define entity count and growth projection
  2. Map intercompany complexity honestly
  3. Estimate close-cycle labor cost today
  4. Compare against structured consolidation platforms

If you are also evaluating alternatives, review:

  • NetSuite vs Sage Intacct
  • Best Accounting Software for Holding Companies

Pricing is not just about subscription.

It is about avoiding structural misalignment.

Scroll to Top